Electrical Stimulation After Nerve Repair Surgery: When to Start and What to Expect

Nerve repair surgery—whether nerve grafting, nerve transfer, or direct repair—offers hope for people with peripheral nerve injuries, including brachial plexus injuries. However, surgery is just the beginning of the recovery journey. After the surgeon has reconnected or rerouted nerves, there's a waiting period while regenerating nerve fibres grow toward their target muscles. This process is slow, measured in months rather than weeks.

During this waiting period, a critical question arises: what happens to the muscles? Without nerve signals, they begin to atrophy and deteriorate. If the muscle degenerates too severely before reinnervation occurs, even successful nerve regeneration may not restore function—the nerve reconnects, but finds a muscle no longer capable of responding.

This is where electrical stimulation plays a crucial role. By keeping muscles viable during the reinnervation window, stimulation can significantly improve the chances of functional recovery. In this article, I'll explain how nerve regeneration works, when to consider electrical stimulation, and what to expect throughout the process.

Understanding Nerve Regeneration After Surgery

When a peripheral nerve is damaged and surgically repaired, recovery depends on axons (the long fibres extending from nerve cells) regenerating from the site of repair toward their target muscles. This process follows predictable principles established through decades of clinical observation and research.

Axons regenerate at approximately 1 millimetre per day, or roughly 2.5-3 centimetres per month (Seddon, 1943; Sunderland, 1991). This rate is a typical clinical estimate that cannot be significantly accelerated, though it varies somewhat between nerves—the ulnar nerve regenerates at approximately 1.5 mm/day, while the radial nerve may achieve 4-5 mm/day in optimal conditions. What this means practically is that distance matters enormously: a repair at the wrist might restore hand function in months, while a brachial plexus repair at shoulder level might require 12-18 months for regenerating axons to reach forearm muscles.

This creates what surgeons could reasonably describe as a race against time. While nerves regenerate slowly, muscles deteriorate progressively without nerve signals. The muscle must remain viable long enough for regenerating nerves to reach it. Research by Fu and Gordon (1995) established that muscles can typically accept reinnervation for up to 12-18 months after denervation, though this capacity diminishes over time. Motor endplate degradation—the loss of the specialised structures where nerves connect to muscles—begins as early as 12 months after injury. Beyond 18-24 months, successful reinnervation becomes increasingly unlikely even if nerve regeneration is technically successful. However, individual variation exists; some patients show motor endplate survival well beyond these typical timeframes.

KEY POINT: After nerve repair, there's a race between nerve regeneration and muscle deterioration. Keeping muscles viable until nerves arrive is crucial for functional recovery.

The Problem: Muscle Deterioration During Waiting

Without intervention, denervated muscles don't simply wait patiently for their nerves to return. They actively deteriorate through a well-documented cascade of changes (Kern et al., 2004; Carlson, 2014).

In the first weeks after denervation, muscle fibres begin to atrophy, and cross-sectional area decreases. During the first few months, this atrophy continues while the internal organisation of muscle fibres—the carefully arranged contractile proteins that generate force—begins to degrade. Satellite cells, the muscle stem cells responsible for repair and adaptation, become less responsive to activation signals.

By 6-12 months, muscle mass loss becomes severe, and two particularly problematic changes begin: fat infiltration and fibrosis. Research by Madaro et al. (2018) has shown that denervation activates fibro-adipogenic progenitor cells (FAPs), which begin replacing functional muscle tissue with adipocytes (fat cells) and collagen. Fat and connective tissue infiltration increases markedly over weeks to months, with quantifiable rises in adipose and fibrotic areas. These changes are largely irreversible and predict poor functional outcomes even if reinnervation eventually occurs.

Beyond 12-18 months, muscle fibre size may decrease to a small fraction of normal, with severe structural disorganisation that makes functional recovery impossible even if nerves successfully regenerate (Kern et al., 2004). Studies have documented that denervated muscles can lose up to 50% of their cross-sectional area within the first 3 months, with the human biceps brachii showing statistically significant decreases in both Type I and Type II fibre cross-sectional area that correlate with denervation duration.

This is why surgeons sometimes express frustration: technically successful nerve repairs may still result in poor functional outcomes because the target muscles were no longer viable by the time regenerating nerves arrived.

How Electrical Stimulation Helps

Electrical stimulation addresses this problem by keeping muscles active and healthy during the waiting period. The evidence base for this approach comes primarily from the European RISE project and subsequent studies led by Kern, Carraro, and colleagues (Kern et al., 2005; Kern et al., 2010; Carraro et al., 2015).

Regular electrically-induced contractions prevent—and can partially reverse—atrophy. In a landmark study of 27 spinal cord injured individuals with denervated lower limbs, two years of home-based electrical stimulation increased quadriceps cross-sectional area by 10-35% and muscle fibre diameter by 75% (Kern et al., 2010). Perhaps most striking was the improvement in force output, which increased by over 1000% in responding patients. Twenty-five percent of participants achieved the functional milestone of FES-assisted standing.

Beyond maintaining bulk, stimulation preserves the internal organisation of muscle fibres—the myofibrils, sarcoplasmic reticulum, and T-tubules that enable coordinated contraction. Research shows that stimulated muscles exhibit reduced infiltration of fat and connective tissue compared to unstimulated controls, with improved ultrastructural organisation of contractile material. Satellite cells, the muscle stem cells critical for repair and adaptation, show upregulated activity (increased N-CAM+ expression) in stimulated tissue, keeping them primed for action.

Muscle contractions also promote blood flow, delivering oxygen and nutrients while removing metabolic waste—a benefit that extends beyond the immediate training effect. The cumulative result is that a stimulated muscle remains healthy and responsive, far more likely to successfully integrate with regenerating nerves when they eventually arrive.

KEY POINT: Electrical stimulation keeps muscles "ready and waiting" for reinnervating nerves, dramatically improving the chances of functional recovery. Check that there are no contra-indications prior to using

When to Start Stimulation After Surgery

The timing of post-surgical stimulation is important and should be discussed with your surgical team. General principles include:

Immediate post-operative period: The first weeks after surgery focus on wound healing and protecting the repair site. Vigorous activity in the surgical area is typically avoided.

Early intervention (2-4 weeks post-surgery): Once initial healing has occurred, stimulation can often begin. The exact timing depends on the type of surgery and your surgeon's preferences.

Don't delay too long: Given the progressive nature of denervation atrophy, waiting months to start stimulation can lead to unnecessary muscle deterioration. If your surgeon hasn't mentioned electrical stimulation, ask about it.

Individual guidance is essential: The appropriate starting point depends on your specific surgery, injury, and healing progress. Work with your medical team to determine the right timing for your situation.

The Different Phases of Post-Surgical Stimulation

Electrical stimulation after nerve repair surgery typically progresses through distinct phases:

Phase 1: Immediate Post-Surgery (Before Stimulation Begins)

During the initial healing period:

- Focus on wound care and protecting the surgical site

- Gentle range of motion exercises as approved by your surgeon

- Education and preparation for the stimulation programme ahead

Phase 2: Early Stimulation (Starting 2-6 Weeks Post-Surgery)

Once cleared to begin:

- Start with denervated muscle stimulation protocols (long pulse widths, appropriate for muscles without nerve supply)

- Goal: maintain muscle mass and tissue quality

- Frequency: typically 30 minutes per muscle group, 5-6 days per week

- Intensity: sufficient to produce visible contractions

Important: During this phase, muscles are denervated. Standard NMES will not work—you need equipment capable of direct muscle fibre stimulation, such as the RISE Stimulator or KT-Parase

Phase 3: Monitoring for Reinnervation (Months 3-18+)

As you continue stimulation, watch for signs that reinnervation is occurring:

- Muscles beginning to respond to lower stimulation intensities

- Spontaneous muscle twitches (fasciculations)

- Emerging response to standard NMES parameters

- Any voluntary flicker of movement, however small

- Changes on EMG testing if performed

KEY POINT: Reinnervation typically begins months after surgery. Stay alert for early signs while maintaining your stimulation programme.

Phase 4: Transition Period (When Reinnervation Begins)

As nerves begin to reconnect:

- Muscles may respond to both denervated muscle stimulation AND standard NMES

- Gradually transition to NMES protocols as innervation improves

- Begin incorporating voluntary movement attempts

- Coordinate with physiotherapy for motor re-education

This transition period is exciting—it means the nerve repair is working and function may be returning.

Phase 5: Rehabilitation and Strengthening

Once reinnervation is established:

- Standard NMES and FES become effective

- Focus shifts to strengthening and functional recovery

- Intensive physiotherapy to maximise functional outcomes

- Gradual increase in voluntary activity

Realistic Expectations

Let me be clear about what electrical stimulation can and cannot achieve in the post-surgical context.

Electrical stimulation can preserve muscle mass during the reinnervation window, maintain tissue quality and internal structure, and keep muscles capable of responding when nerves arrive. The research demonstrates that it significantly improves the chances of functional recovery and can potentially accelerate functional gains once reinnervation occurs.

However, stimulation cannot speed up nerve regeneration—the 1 mm/day rate is determined by biology and remains constant regardless of what we do to the muscle. It cannot guarantee successful reinnervation, as this depends on factors including surgical technique, injury severity, and individual healing capacity. It cannot produce voluntary movement before nerves reconnect; the contractions you see during stimulation are electrically induced, not volitional. And it cannot overcome a technically unsuccessful surgical repair.

Success in this context means maintaining muscle bulk close to pre-injury or immediate post-surgery levels throughout the waiting period. It means achieving visible, strong contractions that confirm the muscle is responding. Ultimately, it means successful integration of regenerating nerves with preserved muscle, followed by functional recovery once reinnervation is established.

The combination of successful nerve surgery and maintained muscle viability produces the best outcomes. Stimulation addresses the muscle side of this equation—and the research suggests it does so effectively when applied consistently and with appropriate parameters.

Specific Considerations for Brachial Plexus Injuries

Brachial plexus injuries are among the most common situations where post-surgical electrical stimulation is valuable. These injuries present specific considerations:

Multiple muscles affected: Brachial plexus injuries typically affect multiple upper limb muscles. Stimulation protocols may need to address shoulder, arm, and, potentially, forearm muscles depending on the injury level.

Proximity of denervated and innervated muscles: The upper limb has muscles in close proximity that may have different innervation status. Electrode placement and possibly waveform selection (rectangular vs. triangular pulses) may need adjustment to selectively target denervated muscles.

Long regeneration distances: In severe brachial plexus injuries, regenerating nerves must travel long distances to reach distal muscles. The hand muscles, for example, may require 18+ months to reinnervate after shoulder-level repairs. Sustained stimulation over this extended period is essential.

Complex reconstruction: Brachial plexus surgery often involves multiple procedures—nerve grafts, nerve transfers, tendon transfers. The stimulation protocol should be coordinated with the overall surgical plan.

Functional priorities: Work with your surgical team to understand which muscles are most important for your functional goals and prioritise stimulation accordingly.

Equipment Considerations

During the denervated phase (after injury and before reinnervation), you need equipment capable of direct muscle fibre stimulation. This is critically important: denervated muscle fibres have an excitation threshold approximately 1000 times higher than innervated muscle (Kern et al., 2010), which is why standard NMES devices are ineffective.

The RISE stimulator

The required specifications include pulse widths of 100-200 milliseconds (compared to the 0.2-0.4 milliseconds typical of standard NMES), current output of 200-250 mA, appropriate waveform options including both rectangular and triangular pulses, and programmable protocols that support extended stimulation sessions. The RISE Stimulator meets these requirements and was specifically designed for denervated muscle work. In some cases, a model from the KT range, such as the KT Motion or KT-Parese, may be appropriate. The KT units are more limited in the stimulation parameters they support, but suitability can be verified during an assessment. The RISE Stimulator evolved from the product used in the quoted RISE research study, but other devices with similar technical capabilities can, of course, be used.

Electrode selection matters as well. You need large electrodes that cover as much of the target muscle as possible, typically wet sponge electrodes with carbon-rubber backing or safety electrodes with conductive gel. Standard adhesive gel pads used with conventional NMES devices are generally not suitable for the higher current densities required for denervated muscle stimulation and can cause skin irritation or burns. We do occasionally use gel electrodes to isolate specific muscles, but this is decided at assessment and is the exception rather than the rule.

As reinnervation progresses, standard NMES equipment may become useful. The transition period—when muscles respond to both denervated protocols and standard NMES—is an encouraging sign that nerve regeneration is succeeding. Some people eventually transition entirely to conventional stimulators once innervation is restored, using them for ongoing strengthening and maintenance.

Working With Your Medical Team

Electrical stimulation after nerve repair surgery should be coordinated with your surgical and rehabilitation team:

Before surgery: Discuss post-operative electrical stimulation with your surgeon. Not all surgeons are familiar with this approach, but most are supportive when presented with the evidence. If there is going to be a lengthy wait before surgery, consider starting electrical stimulation as a pre-operative measure for the reasons expressed above. It will help avoid the damaging effects of denervation on muscle tissue.

Early post-operative: Confirm when it's safe to begin stimulation. Get clearance in writing if helpful.

During the waiting period, Regular surgical follow-ups monitor nerve regeneration (sometimes with EMG). Share information about your stimulation programme and any changes you observe.

When reinnervation begins, coordinate the transition from denervated-muscle protocols to standard rehabilitation approaches. Physiotherapy becomes increasingly important.

Long-term: Continue working with your rehabilitation team to maximise functional recovery once reinnervation is established.

Emerging Research: Brief Electrical Stimulation During Surgery

An emerging area of research involves brief electrical stimulation applied during nerve repair surgery itself—not as a post-operative home-based programme, but as an intraoperative adjunct. The foundational work in this area comes from Tessa Gordon's laboratory in Canada (Al-Majed et al., 2000; Gordon et al., 2010).

Studies have shown that brief stimulation—as short as one hour at 20 Hz—applied directly to the nerve at the time of repair can dramatically accelerate axon regeneration. In animal models, this protocol reduced the time for complete regeneration from 10 weeks to just 3 weeks (Al-Majed et al., 2000). The mechanism involves upregulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its receptor trkB: one hour of stimulation results in a 3-fold increase in BDNF within 8 hours, peaking at 6-fold by day two. Without stimulation, this same upregulation takes 7 days to occur naturally.

Human trials have confirmed these benefits. Gordon et al. (2010) demonstrated that brief post-surgical stimulation in carpal tunnel syndrome patients achieved complete reinnervation of thenar muscles by 6 months, compared to no significant improvement at one year in unstimulated controls. More recently, a double-blind, randomised controlled trial by Power et al. (2020) showed enhanced recovery in patients with severe cubital tunnel syndrome who received intraoperative stimulation.

This technique is being explored in clinical practice at specialist centres, particularly for carpal tunnel release, cubital tunnel decompression, and brachial plexus nerve transfers. If you're scheduled for nerve repair surgery, you might ask your surgeon whether intraoperative electrical stimulation is something they offer or would consider. This is separate from—and complementary to—the post-operative home-based stimulation discussed in this article.

The Timeline: Putting It Together

Here's a typical timeline for someone undergoing brachial plexus nerve repair surgery:

Week 0: Surgery performed
Weeks 1-3: Wound healing, gentle mobilisation, preparation for stimulation
Week 4: Begin home-based denervated muscle stimulation (timing varies—follow your surgeon's guidance)
Months 1-6: Consistent daily stimulation. Maintain muscle mass. Watch for early signs of reinnervation.
Months 6-12: Continue stimulation. Reinnervation may begin for closer muscles. Possible early voluntary flickers.
Months 12-18: Reinnervation progressing. Transition to NMES for reinnervated muscles. Continue denervated protocols for muscles still waiting.
Months 18-24+: Most reinnervation complete (for muscles that will reinnervate). Intensive rehabilitation for functional recovery.
Long-term: Maintenance stimulation if any persistent denervation. Standard strengthening for reinnervated muscles.

Summary

Electrical stimulation after nerve repair surgery (and potentially before) addresses a critical gap in the recovery process: maintaining muscle viability while slowly regenerating nerves arrive. By preventing the muscle deterioration that would otherwise occur, stimulation significantly improves the chances that successful nerve regeneration translates into functional recovery.

The evidence from studies like the European RISE project demonstrates that consistent, properly-applied stimulation can maintain and even increase muscle mass, preserve internal muscle structure, and dramatically improve force output in denervated muscle. The key principles are to start stimulation early once wound healing permits, use appropriate equipment designed for denervated muscle rather than standard NMES, maintain consistency over the extended regeneration period that may span 12-18 months or longer, monitor carefully for signs of reinnervation, coordinate with your surgical and rehabilitation team throughout, and transition to standard rehabilitation approaches as reinnervation establishes.

If you've had nerve repair surgery—or are planning to—and want to discuss how electrical stimulation might fit into your recovery plan, please contact us. We work with many people following brachial plexus surgery and other nerve repairs, and we're happy to discuss your specific situation.

The information in this article is provided for educational purposes and reflects current research on electrical stimulation after nerve repair surgery. It is not intended as individual medical advice. Your situation is unique, and decisions about your rehabilitation should be made in consultation with your surgical and medical team, who understand your specific injury, surgery, and circumstances.

Further Reading

- Electrical stimulation and improved outcomes for brachial plexus injuries ( /articles/electrical-stimulation-and-improved-outcomes-for-brachial-plexus-injuries)

- Can electrical stimulation help denervated muscles recover?( /articles/can-electrical-stimulation-help-denervated-muscles-recover)

- Why your NMES product probably doesn't work with denervated muscle (/articles/why-your-nmes-product-probably-doesnt-work-with-denervated-muscle)

- FES and peripheral nerve injuries: exploring benefits of functional electrical stimulation (/articles/fes-and-peripheral-nerve-injuries)

References

Al-Majed AA, Neumann CM, Bhushert TM, Gordon T. (2000). Brief electrical stimulation promotes the speed and accuracy of motor axonal regeneration. *Journal of Neuroscience*, 20(7), 2602-2608.

Al-Majed AA, Bhushert TM, Gordon T. (2000). Electrical stimulation accelerates and increases expression of BDNF and trkB mRNA in regenerating rat femoral motoneurons. *European Journal of Neuroscience*, 12(12), 4381-4390.

Carlson BM. (2014). The Denervated Muscle: 45 Years Later. *Neurological Research*, 36(4), 373-380.

Carraro U, Kern H, Gava P, et al. (2015). Biology of Muscle Atrophy and of its Recovery by FES in Aging and Mobility Impairments: Roots and By-Products. *European Journal of Translational Myology*, 25(4), 221-230.

Fu SY, Gordon T. (1995). Contributing factors to poor functional recovery after delayed nerve repair: prolonged denervation. *Journal of Neuroscience*, 15(5), 3886-3895.

Gordon T, Amirjani N, Edwards DC, Chan KM. (2010). Brief post-surgical electrical stimulation accelerates axon regeneration and muscle reinnervation without affecting the functional measures in carpal tunnel syndrome patients. *Experimental Neurology*, 223(1), 192-202.

Gordon T, English AW. (2016). Strategies to promote peripheral nerve regeneration: electrical stimulation and/or exercise. *European Journal of Neuroscience*, 43(3), 336-350.

Kern H, Boncompagni S, Rossini K, et al. (2004). Long-term denervation in humans causes degeneration of both contractile and excitation-contraction coupling apparatus, which is reversible by functional electrical stimulation (FES): a role for myofiber regeneration? *Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology*, 63(9), 919-931.

Kern H, Salmons S, Mayr W, et al. (2005). Recovery of long-term denervated human muscles induced by electrical stimulation. *Muscle & Nerve*, 31(1), 98-101.

Kern H, Carraro U, Adami N, et al. (2010). Home-based functional electrical stimulation rescues permanently denervated muscles in paraplegic patients with complete lower motor neuron lesion. *Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair*, 24(8), 709-721.

Madaro L, Passaponti M, et al. (2018). Denervation-activated STAT3-IL-6 signaling in fibro-adipogenic progenitors promotes myofibres atrophy and fibrosis. *Nature Cell Biology*, 20, 917-927.

Power HA, Morhart MJ, Olson JL, Chan KM. (2020). Postsurgical Electrical Stimulation Enhances Recovery Following Surgery for Severe Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. *Neurosurgery*, 86(6), 769-777.

Seddon HJ. (1943). Three types of nerve injury. *Brain*, 66(4), 237-288.

Sunderland S. (1991). *Nerve Injuries and Their Repair: A Critical Appraisal*. Churchill Livingstone.

Willand MP, Nguyen MA, Bhushert TM, Gordon T. (2016). Electrical Stimulation to Promote Peripheral Nerve Regeneration. *Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair*, 30(5), 490-496.



Next
Next

Why structure beats willpower in neurological rehabilitation