This article explores how the timing and intensity of home-based Functional Electrical Stimulation (hbFES) can affect recovery after complete denervation injury. It looks at how stimulation parameters may influence the structural recovery of lower motor neurons and muscle fibres, and why starting early and using the right dose of stimulation could be important for outcomes. The article summarises key findings and practical considerations, offering insight for clinicians and individuals interested in evidence-based hbFES use.

In the world of neurorehabilitation, two approaches have emerged as prominent tools for helping patients regain mobility and function: Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) Cycling and Passive Movement Training (PMT). While both have their place in rehabilitation settings, understanding their distinct benefits and limitations is crucial for healthcare professionals and patients alike. PMT, utilising motorized bikes like the Thera or MOTOmed, has long been a staple in hospitals and homes due to its ease of use and accessibility. However, the integration of electrical stimulation in FES Cycling has opened new doors in rehabilitation, particularly for those with spinal cord injuries, stroke, cerebral palsy, and multiple sclerosis. With over three decades of research backing its efficacy, FES Cycling represents a significant advancement in rehabilitation technology – but what makes it truly different from traditional PMT, and why should clinicians and patients take notice? Let's delve into the science behind these approaches and explore their comparative benefits for patient outcomes.

Electrical stimulation can be an effective way to strengthen skeletal muscle, but outcomes depend heavily on how it’s applied. This article explores what the research suggests about effectiveness, and which stimulation parameters appear most important - such as intensity, frequency, pulse duration, and session length. It highlights why correct dosing and progression matter, and how stimulation can be tailored to support different strength and rehabilitation goals. A useful overview for clinicians and individuals looking to understand evidence-based stimulation for muscle strengthening.

Recovery and progress often seem daunting, especially when facing significant physical challenges or lifestyle changes. Whether you're an injured patient working through rehabilitation or someone who has fallen out of healthy habits, the gap between where you are and where you want to be can feel overwhelming. This article explores why taking that first small step - no matter how modest it may seem - is the most crucial part of any journey toward recovery or positive change. Drawing from both clinical experience with rehabilitation patients and personal insights about motivation, we'll examine how the compound effect of small, consistent actions can lead to remarkable transformations, even when the path ahead appears insurmountable.

In this article, we step back and consider how brachial plexus injuries are treated and then look at how forms of electrical stimulation might contribute to achieving the best clinical outcome.

Brachial plexus injuries present a complex challenge in medical practice, with the potential to produce significant functional impairment and reduced quality of life. Effective treatment requires a meticulous, multifaceted approach, combining surgical and non-surgical interventions tailored to the patient's specific needs. This article explores current treatment strategies, focusing on the potential role of electrical stimulation as a complementary therapy. By examining its applications and efficacy, we aim to highlight how this innovative technique could enhance recovery and optimise clinical outcomes for individuals affected by these injuries.

The Tek RMD distinguishes itself from other mobility devices through its unique design philosophy, functionality, and target user needs. This doesn't mean that it is the perfect choice for everyone. Individuals with weak or paralysed limbs will ultimately have different physical abilities and functional goals. The Tek RMD allows individuals who are suitable to use it, to stand and move in their environment and to do this in a way that will enable them to do more than if they just were using a standing frame. They can stand for lengthy periods, interact at eye level with others and uniquely engage in their environment. We know that standing is good for health but most candidates for the Tek RMD or standing wheelchair want to do more.

Choosing the right product requires thoughtful consideration. It’s important to assess each option’s physical suitability while carefully evaluating its strengths and weaknesses in relation to the user’s functional goals.